Background
As Washington’s foreign policy apparatus remains consumed by the Middle East, the Ukraine war, and the China rivalry, a quieter but deeply dangerous situation is deteriorating in South Asia. The ceasefire between India and Pakistan — fragile since the April 2025 Pahalgam attack and the subsequent Operation Sindoor — is now under more sustained pressure than at any point since the four-day “mini-war” of May 2025.
A new assessment from the Council on Foreign Relations places a potential India-Pakistan armed conflict in 2026 at “moderate likelihood” — a framing that deserves more attention than it has received. The assessment, part of the CFR’s eighteenth annual Preventive Priorities Survey, reflects the professional consensus of American foreign policy experts: the underlying triggers of last year’s escalation have not been neutralized. They have been compressed.
Operation Sindoor — India’s precision drone and missile strikes against terror infrastructure across the Line of Control — achieved its immediate military objectives. But the political settlement that followed was a ceasefire, not a resolution. Pakistan’s leadership has made clear through repeated statements that it views the operation as an unresolved grievance, not a closed chapter. The anniversary of the Pahalgam attack on April 22 is approaching in 2026 with no diplomatic off-ramp established between the two sides. The absence of a back-channel engagement process is itself a signal.
Key Developments
What has changed since May 2025 is the arms balance. India’s Defence Acquisition Council cleared a Rs 79,000 crore package — approximately $9.4 billion — focused on kill-chain capabilities: loitering munitions, advanced air-to-air missile systems, and integrated air defence upgrades. The procurement is directly traceable to vulnerabilities exposed during the four-day conflict, when Pakistan’s air defence network proved less penetrable than Indian military planners had anticipated. Islamabad, for its part, has accelerated negotiations with Turkey and China for advanced surface-to-air systems, seeking to close the gap that Operation Sindoor’s initial phase exposed.
The Afghanistan-Pakistan border adds a layer of complexity the CFR report identifies for the first time. A potential conflict between the Taliban and Islamabad is now ranked as a “moderate likelihood” — a new variable in a region already burdened by sectarian spillover from the Iran conflict and the broader Shia-Sunni tensions that have intensified since the Hormuz closure. Afghanistan’s Taliban government maintains deep ties to Pakistan’s military intelligence apparatus, a relationship that has historically been both a stabiliser and a flashpoint, depending on which direction the political winds blow.
For the United States, the India-Pakistan relationship represents a scenario with no good outcomes. A conflict between two nuclear-armed states — even a limited one — would demand American diplomatic attention at precisely the moment the administration is attempting to manage simultaneous crises in the Middle East and Eastern Europe. The current diplomatic architecture, such as it is, relies on back-channel communication through third parties. There is no direct US engagement with Pakistan on this issue, and the State Department’s South Asia desk has been operationally degraded by the redirected resource flows to Middle East theatre management.
Analysis
The ceasefire holds for now. But the conditions that produced the May 2025 conflict — terrorist attack, political escalation, military retaliation, international pressure, temporary ceasefire — remain fully intact. What has changed is that both sides have spent the intervening twelve months upgrading their capabilities with the explicit lesson of that conflict in mind. The next trigger will not be answered with the same constraints.
This is the strategic logic that makes the CFR’s “moderate likelihood” assessment more alarming than the language suggests. Moderate, in this context, does not mean improbable. It means the experts cannot rule it out — and have not been given reason to believe it is less likely than it was a year ago.
The Hormuz crisis has consumed the bandwidth of every major power. The result is that the most dangerous unaddressed flashpoint in the world’s most heavily nuclear-armed neighbourhood is moving toward a more volatile state with fewer people watching.
Word count: 628
